Αναζήτηση / Search

  
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές

 

 

 

 

Περιεχόμενα/Contents

Αιτιολογία και θεραπευτική αντιμετώπιση των καθ'έξιν αποβολών
• 1. Φυσιολογία της κύησης
• Μεταβολές γονιμοποιημένου ωαρίου μέχρι την εμφύτευση
• Έκτοπη κύηση
• Η επίδραση των αυξητικών παραγόντων και των κυτταροκινών στην εμφυτευτική διαδικασία του ενδομητρίου
• Κύτταρα και ουσίες που συμβάλλουν στη λειτουργικότητα του ενδομητρίου
• Πρώιμη εμβρυϊκή περίοδος
• Όψιμη εμβρυϊκή περίοδος
• Εμβρυολογία γεννητικού συστήματος του θήλεος
• Αυτόματη αποβολή
• Καθ’ έξιν αποβολές
• 2. Ανατομικά αίτια, γενετικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
• Γενετικά αίτια
• Ανατομικά αίτια
• Ινομυώματα και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Συμφύσεις και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Πολύποδες ενδομητρίου και ο ρόλος τους στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Ανεπάρκεια του τραχήλου της μήτρας
• 3. Ενδοκρινολογικά αίτια και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
• Ανεπάρκεια ωχρού σωματίου
• Πολυκυστικές ωοθήκες και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Θυρεοειδής και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Προλακτίνη (PRL)
• Ο ρόλος της προλακτίνης στην αιτιολογία των καθ’έξιν αποβολών
• Σακχαρώδης διαβήτης και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• 4. Ο ρόλος του μικροβιακού παράγοντα στις καθ'έξιν αποβολές και άλλοι παράγοντες κινδύνου
• Ο ρόλος του μικροβιακού παράγοντα στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Ο ρόλος του Chlamydia trachomatis στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Ο ρόλος του Toxoplasma Gondii στις καθ’ έξιν αποβολές
• Μυκοπλασματικός αποικισμός του γυναικείου γεννητικού συστήματος ως αιτία καθ’ έξιν αποβολών
• Ο ρόλος της μη ειδικής βακτηριακής κολπίτιδας στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Ο ρόλος της Listeria monocytogenes στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Ο ρόλος του CMV στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Συμπέρασμα
• Ο ρόλος διαφόρων άλλων παραγόντων κινδύνου στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• 5. Αυτοάνοσα νοσήματα - αλλοάνοσα νοσήματα και καθ'έξιν αποβολές
• Αυτοάνοσα νοσήματα – αλλοάνοσα νοσήματα και καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Κύτταρα φυσικής και επίκτητης ανοσίας
• MHC Μείζον σύστημα ιστοσυμβατότητας
• Η εμβρυομητρική ανοσολογική σχέση
• HLA σύστημα, Τ-κύτταρα, ΝΚ-κύτταρα και ανοσοβιολογία της κύησης
• ΣΕΛ και επαπειλούμενες αυτόματες αποβολές
• Αντιφωσφολιπιδικό σύνδρομο και επιπλοκές κύησης
• Νόσος Graves
• Θυρεοειδίτιδα Hashimoto
• Εγκυμοσύνη και αυτοάνοσες παθήσεις του θυρεοειδούς
• Σκληρόδερμα
• Ρευματοειδής αρθρίτιδα
• Σύνδρομο Sjogren
• Αγγειίτιδες
• Μυασθένεια Gravis
• Ενδομητρίωση
• Αλλοάνοσα νοσήματα και επαπειλούμενες αυτόματες αποβολές
• Διάγνωση αλλοάνοσων και αυτοάνοσων καθ’ έξιν αποβολών
• Θεραπευτική αντιμετώπιση αλλοάνοσων αιτίων
• 6. Η θρομβοφιλία ως αίτιο καθ'έξιν αποβολών
• Η θρομβοφιλία ως αίτιο καθ’έξιν αποβολών
• Θρομβοφιλία και εγκυμοσύνη
• Παθογένεια της θρομβοφιλίας στις καθ’έξιν αποβολές
• Διάγνωση – προσυμπτωματικός έλεγχος (screening)
• Θεραπεία

 

 

Βιβλιογραφία

  1. Successful pregnancy after preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a female with Robertsonian translocation. Wu YC, Chen CK, Huang HY, Chou CJ, Soong YK. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Aug;103(8):637-9.
  2. Predictability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations on prospective attempts. Authors: S. Munné; T. Escudero; P. Colls; Z. Xuezhong; M. Oter; M. Garrisi; F. Barnes; C. Zouves; L. Werlin; C. Magli; J. Cohen. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Volume 9, Number 6, December 2004, pp. 645-651(7)
  3. Aneuploidy 12 in a Robertsonian (13;14) carrier: Case report. C. Gutiérrez-Mateo, L. Gadea, J. Benet, D. Wells, S. Munné and J. Navarro. 1 Departament de Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Unitat de Biologia i Genètica Mèdica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain, 2 Reprogenetics, 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 501, West Orange, NJ 07052, 3 Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, St Barnabas Medical Centre, 94 Old Short Hills Road, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA. Human Reproduction 2005 20(5):1256-1260
  4. Pregnancy outcome when both members of a couple have balanced translocations. Campbell SA, Uhlmann WR, Duquette D, Johnson MP, Evans MI. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;85(5 Pt 2):844-6
  5. Segregation analysis and genetic counselling when both parents carry balanced chromosomal translocations. Phillips OP, Tharapel AT, Shulman LP, Simpson JL, Elias S. University of Tennessee, Memphis. Fertil Steril. 1991 Oct;56(4):646-52.
  6. Successful pregnancy after preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a female with Robertsonian translocation. Wu YC, Chen CK, Huang HY, Chou CJ, Soong YK. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Aug;103(8):637-9.
  7. Investigation of recurrent miscarriages. BMJ 2005;331:121-122 (16 July)
  8. Re: Familial cryptic translocation (2;17) ascertained through recurrent spontaneous abortions: Bruyere H, Rajcan-Separovic E, Doyle J, Pantzar T, Langlois S. Bacino CA, Bischoff FZ, Shaffer LG. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 1;130(4):439-40.
  9. Balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements (BCCR) with at least three chromosomes and three or more breakpoints: report of three new cases. Lespinasse J, Rethore MO, North MO, Bovier-Lapierre M, Lundsteen C, Fert-Ferrer S, Bugge M, Kirchoff M. Cytogenetic Laboratory, General Hospital, BP 1125, 73011 Chambery cedex, France. Ann Genet. 2004 Jul-Sep;47(3):315-24.
  10. Prenatal diagnosis of an extra der(4) resulting from a complex maternal chromosome translocation. Migliori MV, Pettinari A, Ciaschini AM, Piermattei P, Pigliapoco F, Discepoli G. Centre of Medical Genetic and Prenatal Diagnosis, Az.Osp, G.Salesi, Ancona, Italy. Prenat Diagn. 2004 Apr;24(4):290-2.
  11. Familial cryptic translocation (2;17) ascertained through recurrent spontaneous abortions. Bruyere H, Rajcan-Separovic E, Doyle J, Pantzar T, Langlois S. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada. Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Dec 15;123(3):285-9.
  12. Chromosomal abnormalities as a cause of recurrent abortions: a hospital experience. Azim M, Khan AH, Khilji ZL, Pal JA, Khurshid M. Department of Pathology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2003 Mar;53(3):117-9.
  13. A novel family-specific translocation t(2;20)(p24.1;q13.1) associated with recurrent abortions: molecular characterization and segregation analysis in male meiosis. Trappe R, Bohm D, Kohlhase J, Weise A, Liehr T, Essers G, Meins M, Zoll B, Bartels I, Burfeind P. Institute of Human Genetics, Georg August University Gottingen, Germany. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;98(1):1-8.
  14. An 11p;17p telomeric translocation in two families associated with recurrent miscarriages and Miller-Dieker syndrome. Joyce CA, Dennis NR, Howard F, Davis LM, Thomas NS. Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP2 8BJ, UK. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;10(11):707-14.
  15. Subtelomeric translocations are not a frequent cause of recurrent miscarriages. Fan YS, Zhang Y. Am J Med Genet. 2002 Apr 22;109(2):154.
  16. Telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of couples with five or more recurrent miscarriages. Yakut S, Berker-Karauzum S, Simsek M, Zorlu G, Trak B, Luleci G. Akdeniz University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Antalya, Turkey. Clin Genet. 2002 Jan;61(1):26-31.
  17. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case–control study. M.D. Stephenson, K.A. Awartani and W.P. Robinson. 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and 2 Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 3 British Columbia's Research Institute for Children's & Women's Health and 4 British Columbia's Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 2, 446-451, February 2002
  18. Multicolour spectral karyotyping for complex chromosomal rearrangements in repeated abortion or congenital anomalies. Tanemura M, Suzumori K, Nishikawa N, Ishihara Y. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan. Prenat Diagn. 2001 Dec;21(13):1123-8.
  19. Skewed X inactivation and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Robinson WP, Beever C, Brown CJ, Stephenson MD. Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Semin Reprod Med. 2001 Jun;19(2):175-81.
  20. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):678-82.
  21. A de novo complex chromosomal rearrangement with a translocation 7;9 and 8q insertion in a male carrier with no infertility: Case report. Tao Cai, Ping Yu, Danilo A. Tagle, David Lu, Yiwang Chen and Jiahui Xia. 1 National Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Hunan Medical University, Changsha, Peoples' Republic of China, 2 Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of Health, Building 49, Room 3A23, 49 Convent Drive MSC 4442, Bethesda, MD 20892–4442, and 3 Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20016, USA. Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 1, 59-62, January 2001
  22. Paternal gonadal mosaicism detected in a couple with recurrent abortions undergoing PGD: FISH analysis of sperm nuclei proves valuable. Somprasit C, Aguinaga M, Cisneros PL, Torsky S, Carson SA, Buster JE, Amato P, McAdoo SL, Simpson JL, Bischoff FZ. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Aug;9(2):225-30.
  23. Balanced reciprocal translocation mosaicism: clinical implications. Two new cases. Vargas MT, Fernandez-Novoa MC. Unidad de Genetica, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain. Genet Couns. 2001;12(3):269-71.
  24. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Howard Carp, M.B., B.S., Vladimir Toder, Ph.D., Ayala Aviram, Ph.D., Michal Daniely, Ph.D., Shlomo Mashiach, M.D., and Gad Barkai, M.D. Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.75, No. 4, April 2001
  25. Increased frequency of female partner chromosomal abnormalities in patients with high-order implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Arieh Raziel, M.D., Shevach Friedler, M.D., Morey Schachter, M.D., Esti Kasterstein, M.Sc.,Deborah Strassburger, Ph.D., and Raphael Ron-El, M.D. In vitro Fertilization Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.78, No. 3, September 2002
  26. Mechanism of recurrent spontaneous abortions in women with mosaicism of X-chromosome aneuploidies. Pao-Lin Kuo, M.D., and How-Ran Guo, M.D., Sc.D. National Cheng-Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.82, No. 6, December 2004.
  27. Maternal trisomy 21 mosaicism and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.78, No. 2, August 2002.
  28. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations. Mayiumi Sugiura-Ogasawara, M.D., Yasuhico Ozaki, M.D., Takeshi Sato, M.D., Nobuhiro Suzumori, M.D, and Kaoru Suzumori, M.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.81, No. 2, February 2004
  29. Parental Karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage. Howard Carp, M.B., B.S., Baruch Feldman M.D., Ph.D., Gabriel Oelsner, M.D., and Eyal Schiff, M.D. Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Fertility and Sterility. Vol.81, No. 5, May 2004.
  30. Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve success rates in recurrent aborters with translocations? Mayiumi Sugiura-Ogasawara, M.D., and Kaoru Suzumori, M.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan. Hum. Reprod., August 2005
  31. Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Parsanezhad ME. Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus by sonohysterography eliminates the need for laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:176-8
  32. Proctor J, Haney A. Recurrent first trimester pregnancy loss is associated with uterine septum but not with bicornuate uterus. Fertil Steril 2003; 80:1212-4
  33. Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:162-6
  34. Acien P. Reproductive performance of women with congenital uterine anomalies. Hum Reprod, 1993;8:122-6
  35. Propst AM, Hill JA. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Sem Reprod Med 2000;18:341-50
  36. Homer HA, Li T-C, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1-14
  37. Raziel A, Arieli S, Bukovsky I, Caspi E, Golan A. Investigation of the uterine cavity in recurrent aborters. Fertil Steril 1994;62:1080-2
  38. Paul Lin. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. J Womens Health 2004;13:33-39
  39. Maneschi F, Marana R, Muzii L, Mancuso S. Reproductive performance in women with bicornuate uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 24:117
  40. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla – Musoles F. Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277-81
  41. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marcchini M, Franchi D, Tozzi L. Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertil Steril 1996;65:750-2
  42. Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM. Septate versus bicornuate uteriQ errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989;172:749-52
  43. Tulandi t, Arronet GH, Mc Innes RA Arcuate and bicornuate uterine anomalies and infertility. Fertil Steril 1980;34:362-64
  44. Nakada K, Makino T, Tabuchi S. Analysis of congenital uterine anomalies in habitual abortions, evaluation of metroplasty. Fertil Steril 1989;34:842-7
  45. Cooper,Paloma N. Fibroids in pregnancy-common but poorly understood. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60(2):132-8
  46. Propst AM,Hill JA 3rd. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341-50
  47. Mizuki Nishino,Kaori Togashi,Asako Nakai. Uterine contractions evaluated on cine MR imaging in patients with uterine leiomyomas. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:142-6
  48. Salvador E, Bienstock J, Blakemore KJ. Leiomyomata uteri, genetic amniocentesis, and the risk of second-trimester spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5):913-5
  49. Gronlund L, Hertz J. Transvaginal sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility, habitual abortion or metrorrhagia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:415-8
  50. Lolis D.E, Kalantaridou S.N, Makrydimas G. Successful myomectomy during pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2003;18(8):1699-702
  51. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Reproductive outcome before and after laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy for subserous or intramural myomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2003;110:215-9
  52. Pellicano M, Guida M, Bramante S. Reproductive outcome after autocross linked acid gel application in infertile patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2005;83(2):498-9
  53. Lin PC, Thyer A, Soules MR. Intraoperative ultrasound during a laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2004;81(6):1671-4
  54. Guarnacia MM, Rein MS. Traditional surgical approaches to uterine fibroids: abdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001;44(2):385-400
  55. Kumakiri J, Hiroyuki Takeuchi, Kitade M. Pregnancy and delivery after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Min Inv Gynecol 2005;12(3):241-6
  56. Landi S, Fiaccavento A. Pregnancy outcomes and deliveries after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10(2):177-81
  57. Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Soranna L. Fertility outcome: long-term results after laparoscopic myomectomy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2001;15(2):129-34
  58. Marchionni M, Fambrini M, Zambelli V. Reproductive performance before and after abdominal myomectomy:a retrospective analysis Fertil Steril 2004;82(1):154-9
  59. Fernandez H, Sefrioui O, Virelizier C. Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients with infertility. Hum Reprod 2001;16(7):1489-92
  60. McLucas B, Goodwin S, Adler L. Pregnancy following uterine fibroid embolization. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2001;74:1-7
  61. Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata:uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:18-21
  62. Holub Z, Lukac J, Kliment L. Pregnancy outcomes and deliveries following transsection of uterine vessels: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2005;xxx:xxx-xxx
  63. March CM. Intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 82(3):491-505
  64. Hysteroscopic findings in 344 women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Valli E, Zupi E, Marconi D, Vaquero E, Giovannini P, Lazzarin N, Romanini C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli-Isola Tiberina, 00186 Rome, Italy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Aug; 8(3):398-401.
  65. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, Engels V. Department Of Gynaecology, Santa Cristina University Hospital, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/O'Donnell 59, 28009 Madrid, Spain.tperezm@meditex.es Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun; 20(6):1632-5. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
  66. Hysteroscopic polypectomy in 240 premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. raspt@mahidol.ac.th  Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):705-9.
  67. Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile women. Shokeir TA, Shalan HM, El-Shafei MM. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Fertility Care Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.tarek1@mans.eun.eg  J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Apr;30(2):84-9.
  68. The effectiveness of hysteroscopic polypectomy in cases of female infertility. Spiewankiewicz B, Stelmachow J, Sawicki W, Cendrowski K, Wypych P, Swiderska K. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003;30(1):23-5.
  69. International Journal of Gynecology and objetrics 85 (2004). ACOG practice bulletin Cervical Insufficiency. Number48, November 2003
  70. Macdonald R, Smith P, Vyas S . Cervical incompetence: the use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001:18:211-6 (Level III).
  71. Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, Berry SM, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, et al. Does cervical cerclage preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:1325-9, discussion 1329-31(Level II)
  72. Novy MJ , Gupta A, Wothe DD, Gupta S, Kennedy KA, Gravett MG. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol2001:184; 1447-54; discussion 1454-6. (Level II-2).
  73. KesslerI I Soham Z,Lancet M. BlicksteinI I Yemini M, Miskin A, et al. Complications associated with genital colonization in pregnancies with and without cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obster 1988;27:359-63.(Level II-2)
  74. Novy MJ. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reap-preasal 25 years after its introduction. Am J obstet Gynecol 1991;164;1635-41;DISCUSSION 1641-2(Level II-2).
  75. Mahran M. Transabdominal cervical cerclage during pregnancy. A modified technique. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52: 502 -6. (LEVEL III)
  76. Wallenburg HC, Lotgering FK. Transabdominal cerclage for closure of the incompetent cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987;25:121-9. (Level III)
  77. Newcomer J. Peccaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:443-8. (Level III)
  78. Van Dongen PW, Nijhuis JG. Transabdominal cerclage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;41:97-104. (Level III)
  79. Andersen HF. Transvaginal and Transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:77-83 (Level II-2)
  80. Shellhaas CS, lams JD. Ambulatory management of preterm labour. Clin obstet Gynecol 1998;41:491-502.(Level I)
  81. Harger JH. Cervical cerclage:patient selection, morbidity, and success rates. Clin Perinatol 1983;10:321-41. (Level III)
  82. Barter RH, Dusbabeck JA, Riva HL, Parks J. Surgical closure of the incompetence; cervix during the pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958:75:511-24 (Level III)
  83. Toaff R, Toaff ME, Ballas S, Ophir A. Cervical incompetence: diagnostic and therapeutics aspects. Isr J Med Sci 1977;13:39-49.(Level II-2)
  84. Lidegaard O. Cervical incompetence and cerclage in Denmark. A Register based epidemiological survey. Acta Obstet Gynocol Scand.
  85. Harger JH. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol.
  86. Barth WH Jr, Yeomans ER, Hankins GD. Emergent cerclage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:323-6.(Level III)
  87. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp
  88. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Β’ Μαιευτική και Γυναικολογική Κλινική Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών
Αρεταίειο Νοσοκομείο
Διευθυντής: Καθηγητής Γ. Κ. Κρεατσάς
Συντονιστής : Σπ. Δενδρινός, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής
Αθήνα, Νοέμβριος 2005

Πνευματικά δικαιώματα © 2008 - Ασκληπιακό Πάρκο Ιατρικής Σχολής Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών - Πιλοτική εφαρμογή - Ανάληψη ευθυνών
Επιστροφή στην αρχική σελίδα  -  Επικοινωνία


Σας παρακαλούμε να απαντήσετε στο απλό ερώτημα "Θα συνιστούσατε στους φίλους σας και στους γνωστούς σας να επισκεφτούν την Πύλη και να διαβάσουν το συγκεκριμένο κείμενο;" Η απλή αυτή ερώτηση (Business Week, Lanuary 20, 2006 - quoting a Harvard Business Review article) μπορεί να καταδείξει την απήχηση της συγκεκριμένης ιστοσελίδας, σχετικά με το αν επιτελεί το έργο για το οποίο έχει σχεδιαστεί. Βαθμολογήστε στην κλίμακα από 0 εώς 10. Η βαθμολογία σας θα καταχωρηθεί αυτομάτως.